Govt might amend IBC to keep defaulters out of resolution process

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code does not prevent promoters from bidding for these stressed assets during the resolution process.

The government might amend the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code to prevent promoters of bankrupt companies from reacquiring the companies during the resolution process at a big discount. Some owners are reportedly readying to stake a claim to these assets when they are put up for sale by the creditors. 
 
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code does not prevent promoters from bidding for these stressed assets during the resolution process. SBI chief Rajnish Kumar had last week said that legally the existing promoters are “within their rights to participate” in the resolution process. 
 
But promoters regaining control of entities after banks take a big haircut would be politically very controversial and an influential section in the government is keen to prevent this from happening. “There is some discomfort with it (the possibility of promoters buying back assets at a discount). It is being looked at,” a top government official said.  “We are examining it. An amendment to the law could be introduced in the next session of Parliament,” another top government official said. 
 
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs is closely looking at the pros and cons of the issue, as a number of cases have been taken up for resolution. “All options are being looked at,” said an MCA official, adding that there are differing views. The government is keeping a close watch on the progress in cases that are up for resolution, as the IBC is a nascent law. 
 
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) recently amended regulations governing the corporate insolvency resolution process to ensure that as part of due diligence prior to approval of a resolution, the antecedents, credit worthiness and credibility of a resolution applicant, including promoters, are taken into account by the Committee of Creditors. To participate in the resolution process, bidders should not be wilful defaulters and they should be cleared in a forensic audit that should declare that they have not diverted funds from the company. 
 
But some government officials feel that without legislative backing, banning promoters on the basis of these regulations may not be enough. A government official said that there are countries that bar incumbent promoters from participating in the resolution process once they declare bankruptcy, so such a legislative restriction would not be without precedent. 
 
The current law allows independent resolution professionals (IRPs) to invite prospective lenders, investors and other interested parties to present resolution proposals, which means that even the corporate debtor undergoing bankruptcy can put forward a plan. Some IRPs are not in favour of a legislative ban that would impose a blanket ban on promoters. 
 
“Insolvency resolution is a commercial process and, hence, banks and financial institutions should be allowed to take informed decision taking their best business interest in mind. They should not be compelled to reject the offer of existing promoters merely because under their control the company had defaulted, except where there is an allegation of wilful default or misappropriation of funds,” said Pawan Vijay, founder of Corporate Professionals, an advisory firm that employs insolvency professionals.
 
Source: Economic Times

Add new comment